CASE STUDY · HIGHER EDUCATION

University campus chiller plant optimization at the University of Melbourne

Fourteen chilled water plants across the Parkville and Southbank campuses, optimized building by building. The nine that have completed 12-month measurement and verification save 426 MWh a year between them, an average measured saving of 11.1%, independently verified by the university's energy consultants, Broadleaf.

University of Melbourne, Parkville campus
University of Melbourne, Parkville campus
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Sector
Higher education
Buildings
14 contracted, 9 verified
Plant capacity
35,592 kWr
Delivered
2021 to 2025

Verified energy saved

426MWh

Per year (426,444 kWh), portfolio-wide across the nine verified buildings

Average measured saving

11.1%

Across the nine verified buildings, weighted by baseline energy

Verified carbon abated

371tCO2e

Per year, at the NGA 2025 Victorian factor of 0.87 tCO2e/MWh

Buildings verified

9of 14

The remaining five are modeled and awaiting verification

The challenge

A university campus isn't one building repeated. The University of Melbourne runs chilled water plants serving a neuroscience research facility, a rare books library, a performing arts school, a biocontainment institute and a law school, and each of those has a different load profile, a different tolerance for variation and a different set of constraints on what the plant is allowed to do.

Plant capacity across the portfolio ranges from 1,198 kWr at the Nancy Millis Building to 5,300 kWr at the Peter Doherty Institute. Chiller counts range from two to three. Some plants serve laboratories that can't deviate. Others serve teaching space that empties for months at a time.

A single control philosophy applied across all of them would have been simpler to deliver and would have left most of the saving on the table. The university's energy team wanted each plant tuned to its own building, and wanted the results measured rather than asserted.

Every building was modeled on its own data, and every result reported here was measured against that building's own pre-implementation baseline.

Portfolio profile

Buildings contracted
14
Buildings verified
9
Total plant capacity
35,592 kWr
Verified plant capacity
23,562 kWr
Campuses
Parkville, Southbank
Delivery tranches
3
First deployment
2021
Capital expenditure
Nil
Independent verification
Broadleaf, the university's energy consultants
Carbon factor
0.87 tCO2e/MWh (NGA Factors 2025, Victoria, scope 2 and 3)
Sites
Parkville campus
Southbank campus

Verified results

Nine buildings, measured over 12 months

Each verified building was measured over a 12-month reporting period against its own baseline. The measured saving is the reduction in plant energy against that baseline. The portfolio average of 11.1% is weighted by each building's baseline energy. Carbon is converted at 0.87 tCO2e/MWh, the NGA Factors 2025 figure for Victoria (0.78 scope 2 plus 0.09 scope 3). No cost savings are reported for this portfolio.

BuildingPlantMeasured savingRealized kWh per yearStatus
144 Kenneth Myer, Neurosciences4,200 kWr21.8%126,321Verified
248 Peter Doherty Institute5,300 kWr13.6%69,961Verified
401 Nancy Millis Building1,198 kWr8.5%50,417Verified
110 The Spot2,280 kWr10.2%45,415Verified
864 Dance Building, Southbank1,900 kWr10.0%42,311Verified
379 Building, 207 Bouverie Street1,240 kWr13.8%29,679Verified
168 Doug McDonell2,874 kWr5.3%26,333Verified
880 MCM Performing Arts, Southbank1,370 kWr9.3%23,462Verified
106 Law Building3,200 kWr6.2%12,545Verified
Nine buildings verified23,562 kWr11.1% average426,444Verified
177 Baillieu Library*3,500 kWr10.0%*43,863*M&V pending
153 Chemistry, West Wing*2,500 kWr5.8%*26,245*M&V pending
105 Business & Economics*2,500 kWr17.2%*19,141*M&V pending
104 Alan Gilbert Building*1,880 kWr9.0%*17,960*M&V pending
133 Glyn Davis, Melbourne School of Design*1,650 kWr8.5%*16,943*M&V pending

*Forecast: modeled saving issued before implementation. These five buildings haven't completed measurement and verification, and they aren't included in the verified totals. Verified: measured over a 12-month reporting period against the building's own baseline and independently verified by Broadleaf.

The Exergenics approach

Optimization inside the university's own control system

Nothing was installed on the university network. Each strategy was delivered as setpoints and sequences for the incumbent controls contractor to code into the existing building management system.

1

Model each plant on its own data

Historical chiller, pump and cooling tower trends were drawn from each building individually. Plant that shares a campus doesn't share a load profile, and a model built on one building's data doesn't transfer to the next one along.

2

Generate a strategy the plant can actually run

Chiller staging thresholds and condenser water temperature control were generated for each plant and bounded by constraints the site team confirmed. Research and teaching buildings on this campus have hard limits on how far conditions may drift, and the strategy respects them rather than optimizing past them.

3

Implement through the incumbent contractor

The university's incumbent controls contractor coded the recommended strategies into the existing BMS. No hardware was added, no gateway was installed and no external connection to the control network was required.

4

Verify against the building's own baseline

Each verified building was regressed against measured cooling load over a 12-month reporting period and compared with its pre-implementation baseline on the same basis. The portfolio figures in this case study were compiled and independently verified by the university's energy consultants, Broadleaf.

Put a number on your own campus

Exergenics optimizes chilled water plants for universities, hospitals, airports and commercial portfolios. No capital expenditure, no hardware and no disruption to operations.

Verified figures are drawn from 12-month measurement and verification reports and from the portfolio summary compiled by the University of Melbourne's energy consultants, Broadleaf, July 2025. Carbon conversion uses 0.87 tCO2e/MWh, the NGA Factors 2025 figure for Victoria (scope 2 and 3).