CASE STUDY · RESEARCH FACILITY

Air-cooled chiller plant optimization at CSIRO's Synergy Building, Canberra

Optimized staging setpoints for three air-cooled chillers, generated from data in CSIRO's Data Clearing House and integrated by the incumbent BMS contractor within days. The measured saving was 4.3% of plant energy over the summer reporting period. The project is published as an IEA EBC Annex 81 case study.

CSIRO Synergy Building, Acton, Canberra
Office and laboratory building
Client
CSIRO
Location
Canberra, Australia
Sector
Research facility
Plant
3 × 830 kW air-cooled
Data source
Data Clearing House

Energy saving

4.3%

Of plant energy over the summer reporting period

Energy avoided

2,049kWh

Measured over the summer reporting period

Modeled annual saving

1.7%

Simulated across a full year of operation

Hardware added

None

Setpoints only, integrated by the incumbent BMS contractor

The challenge

Every chilled water plant is different, and finding its best setpoints by hand takes engineering time that is in short supply. CSIRO's Synergy Building is an office and laboratory building in Acton, Canberra. Its plant has three air-cooled York screw chillers of 830 kW each, three primary chilled water pumps, three secondary chilled water loops and a thermal storage (buffer) tank.

Condenser water reset doesn't apply to an air-cooled plant, so the opportunity was in chiller staging. The project also tested whether Exergenics could onboard a building directly from CSIRO's Data Clearing House (DCH), a building data platform.

On an air-cooled plant, staging is the main lever. When one chiller can meet the whole load, there is little left to optimize.

Site profile

Client
CSIRO
Building
Synergy Building (Building 801), Acton ACT
Facility type
Office and laboratory
Chillers
3 × air-cooled York screw chillers, 830 kW each
Distribution
3 primary chilled water pumps, 3 secondary loops, buffer tank
Data source
CSIRO Data Clearing House, by API
Implementation
Incumbent BMS contractor, in the existing controller
Capital expenditure
Nil
Carbon factor
0.79 kgCO2e/kWh (ACT grid, as published)
Tariff
15 c/kWh (generic tariff, as published)

Verified results

Measured over the summer reporting period

Savings were measured about one month after implementation against the pre-optimization baseline. Figures are as published in the IEA EBC Annex 81 case study. At the published ACT grid intensity of 0.79 kgCO2e/kWh, the measured saving is about 1.6 tCO2e. At the published generic tariff of 15 c/kWh, it is about $307 over the reporting period.

OutcomeResultStatus
Energy saving4.3% of plant energy over the summer reporting periodVerified
Energy avoided2,049 kWh over the summer reporting periodVerified
Carbon reducedAbout 1.6 tCO2e over the reporting periodVerified
Chiller run timeBalanced across the three chillers. One chiller had been carrying a disproportionate share of the load.Observed
Annual energy saving1.7%, simulated across a full yearModeled
Peak demand savingNot yet verified, because no peak demand event occurred during the M&V periodPending

The annual figure is lower than the summer result because, in cooler months, one chiller often meets the whole load and there is little scope to improve the chiller schedule.

The Exergenics approach

Setpoints for the incumbent BMS contractor

Exergenics doesn't write to the BMS. The optimized setpoints went to the building's incumbent BMS contractor in a simple format, and the contractor integrated them into the existing controller within days.

1

Connect to the Data Clearing House

Exergenics integrated with CSIRO's Data Clearing House by API to extract historical chilled water plant data. Any building already on the platform can now be onboarded the same way.

2

Model the plant

Chiller efficiency was modeled as a function of lift and part load using bi-quadratic regression, checked with k-fold cross-validation. Site knowledge set the constraints. Optimizing equipment loading at every cooling load and ambient condition gave the stage-up and stage-down demand setpoints.

3

Implementation by the incumbent contractor

The incumbent BMS contractor integrated the new staging setpoints into the existing controller. No hardware was added.

4

Measure and revisit

Savings were measured one month after implementation against the pre-optimization baseline. Measurement and verification will be revisited to confirm the long-term result.

What the project showed

Data in a building data platform needs interpretation before it's useful. Equipment metadata, such as location, hierarchy and nameplate data, wasn't stored with the trend data, so the team used BMS screenshots, drawings and site documents to work out what each point meant.

The data set came from a period of low occupancy, so it didn't fully represent normal operation. Storing occupancy, public holidays and normal operating hours alongside the trend data makes the next project faster.

Find the savings in your plant

Exergenics works with water-cooled and air-cooled chilled water plants, using the data the building already collects. No capital expenditure and no new hardware.

Figures are as published in the IEA EBC Annex 81 Data-Driven Smart Buildings case study for the CSIRO Synergy Building.